ISSUE #1: GROWTH . . . . . . . . . . . HOW DO WE PAY FOR IT?

Please Note: The Alternative Revenue Task Force decided in June 2004 to recommend an Adequate Facilities Tax rather than an Impact Fee to the County Commission. Since the Impact Fee is no longer a viable option, the RNA supports the County Commission's resolution for an Adequate Facilities Tax in order to lessen the burden of growth on the property tax payers.

RNA HOME PAGE
AFT BACKGROUND
AFT ACTION
AFT PETITION
AFT MEDIA COVERAGE
 ADEQUATE FACILITIES TAX: BACKGROUND
A LITTLE HISTORY ...

Q: What is the Adequate Facilities Tax (AFT)?
A:
As proposed, the Rutherford County, TN Adequate Facilities Tax is a ONE TIME tax on NEW residential and non-residential development that will be assessed on square footage. This tax is not a new tax because it will replace the current Development Tax. It is more equitable because it is based on square footage: a smaller dwelling will be assessed a smaller tax than a large dwelling.

The following is reproduced directly from the Adequate Facilities Tax Resolution

Q: Why does Rutherford County need an Adequate Facilities Tax (AFT)?
A:
Current projections indicate that our county will continue to grow in population at a rapid rate resulting in additional financial burden on the county. The AFT will lessen the tax burden for paying for the growth by providing an alternative form of revenue to the property tax and wheel tax.

 More new homes = more services & infrastructure to serve those homes.

The following is reproduced directly from the Adequate Facilities Tax Resolution

Q: Why do SOME local legislators oppose the Adequate Facilities Tax (AFT)?
A:
Kent Coleman thinks this bill will hurt the lower income people who want to buy a NEW home. He believes that property tax increases are a more equitable way to raise revenue and that all property tax payers should pay more for our growth. (Listen to his comments before the TN State Legislature at BoroWatch.com) *see note below

What Rep. Coleman seems not to consider to be equally important is the number of people who will be negatively impacted by larger than normal increases in the property tax. Fixed income elderly property owners who have to pay more for insurance and more for medicine, farmers who have huge acreage to pay taxes on even when there is a bad year for their crop, and property owners who will be losing TennCare benefits or who can simply not afford insurance are all at the other end of the spectrum from the low income folks who want to buy NEW homes.

If Rep. Coleman is concerned about lower income people and home ownership, he needs to consider the ones who may be forcing out of their homes or out of farming due to increases in property tax to provide the additional services and infrastructure required by the increase of NEW homes. Could there be a connection between high property taxes on farms and the desire by some for more land for development?

A: Donna Rowland took somebody's pledge not to raise any taxes in order to get elected. She did not conduct a survey of her constituents before she did this.

She will not consider voting for this bill without the county going to the ADDITIONAL EXPENSE of a referendum. She does not seem to believe that our county commission represents the wishes of the people, based on her comment that this is a new tax and that it is "Taxation Without Representation."

She does not hold community meetings to determine the will of the people in her own district. Why?

Basically, it seems that Kent Coleman feels he knows better than the County Commission on how they should pay for growth ... but doesn't ask the people; and Donna Rowland doesn't want to allow the County Commission to follow the will of the people and the recommendation of the Alternative Revenue Task Force (whose work she considered SO important last year) ... but doesn't ask the people .

Who are they listening to?

If you have a specific question regarding the AFT, send us an e-mail and we will do our best to answer it.
THE PROCESS ... HOW IT WORKS ... OR DOESN'T, DEPENDING ON THE INPUT OF CITIZENS LIKE YOU, OR ONLY THE SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS.

 The Adequate Facilities Tax must be supported by our local state delegation in the 2005 State General Assembly in order for it to come back to our county commission for enactment.

The following is an example of how a state representatives can let our ELECTED County Commission down.

www.BoroWatch.com has the index information from the State Archives in Nashville and also the actual audio comments made by Legislators during discussion of HB3582, the Rutherford County Development Tax resolution. LISTEN to the actual audio from the 2004 General Assembly.


*AS A COMMUNITY SERVICE, THE RNA WILL MAKE THE AUDIO PORTION OF OUR LEGISLATIVE DELEGATES' COMMENTS FROM THE HOUSE FLOOR REGARDING THE ADEQUATE FACILITIES TAX AVAILABLE AT THE END OF THE 2005 LEGISLATIVE SESSION.


Home

 Issues

 Get Involved

 Local Government

 Contact Us

 Site Map

 Links
 JOIN US !